Key insights

• 🕵️‍♀️ Tulsi Gabbard brings to light findings on Russian collusion claims, emphasizing their potential impact on political discussions.
• 🕵️‍♂️ Intelligence agencies, including John Brennan and James, were made aware of evidence negating the Russian collusion narrative.
• 📑 The FBI reportedly had prior knowledge regarding crucial information that was noted in their daily intelligence updates.
• 📉 Former President Obama received critical updates in 2016 and 2017 yet chose not to act on the information, suggesting indifference.
• 🔍 The conversation highlights allegations against Donald Trump, stressing the essential need for credible evidence to substantiate claims.
• 🤔 Discussion raises concerns over a possible conspiracy involving top U.S. intelligence figures and the sitting president against Trump, questioning their motives.
• 🇳🇱 The significance of Dutch intelligence information is highlighted as it contradicts the narrative of Russian collusion against Trump.
• 🔄 Gabbard’s revelations could reshape public perception and political debate surrounding the collusion allegations and the involved parties.

Q&A

• What conspiracy is suggested involving U.S. intelligence leaders and Donald Trump? 🤔

  The segment poses allegations of a potential conspiracy involving top U.S. intelligence leaders and a sitting president that may have worked against Donald Trump. This raises important questions about the credibility of the claims made and the motives behind these high-stakes political maneuvers.

• What are the allegations involving Donald Trump and Russian collusion? 🕵️‍♂️

  The video discusses the allegations of collusion involving Donald Trump, emphasizing the critical importance of tangible evidence to support any claims of wrongdoing. It also highlights how narratives surrounding these accusations have evolved over time.

• What role did Barack Obama play in the Russian collusion narrative? 🙈

  Barack Obama was updated with intelligence reports in 2016 and 2017 regarding the Russian collusion allegations but chose to ignore this information. His refusal to engage with these updates suggests a possible reluctance to confront the realities of the situation.

• Did the FBI have prior knowledge of the Russian collusion information? 📑

  Yes, the FBI likely possessed prior knowledge of significant information pertaining to the Russian collusion claims. This is evidenced by their intelligence notes and the preparation of daily and weekly digests that would have included crucial insights.

• What information did intelligence agencies have regarding Russian collusion? 🕵️‍♂️

  Intelligence agencies, including figures like John Brennan and James Clapper, were alerted by Dutch sources that there was no evidence supporting the claims of Russian collusion. This awareness existed before public assertions were made, suggesting that decision-makers had access to critical intelligence that was not disclosed.

• What did Tulsi Gabbard reveal about the Russian collusion hoax? 🕵️‍♀️

  Tulsi Gabbard disclosed significant findings regarding the Russian collusion hoax that highlight important implications for political discourse. She pointed out that major intelligence agencies had prior knowledge disproving the claims of collusion, which raises questions about the narratives promoted during and after the election.

• 00:00 This week, Tulsi Gabbard revealed significant findings regarding the Russian collusion hoax, drawing attention to important implications. 🕵️‍♀️
• 00:09 Intelligence agencies, including John Brennan and James, were aware from Dutch information that there was no Russian collusion. 🕵️‍♂️
• 00:18 The FBI likely had prior knowledge of significant information, as indicated by their intelligence notes and daily digests. 📑
• 00:27 Barack Obama was presented with updates in 2016 and 2017 that he chose to ignore, indicating a reluctance to engage with the information.
• 00:37 The segment discusses allegations of collusion involving Donald Trump, emphasizing the need for evidence to support claims of wrongdoing. It suggests a narrative framework around these accusations. 🕵️‍♂️
• 00:44 The discussion revolves around the potential conspiracy of top U.S. intelligence leaders and a sitting president working against Donald Trump, raising questions about credibility and motives. 🤔