Key insights

• 🕵️‍♂️ Tulsi Gabbard exposes intelligence agencies' prior knowledge of no collusion evidence, raising questions about political motivations.
• 🔍 Claims arise regarding Hillary Clinton's campaign hiring operatives for opposition research against Trump during the 2016 election.
• 📜 The Steele dossier is discredited, emphasizing that investigations found no credible evidence of Russian collusion.
• 🔎 Allegations of intelligence leaders manipulating reports to maintain the collusion narrative despite contradictory evidence.
• ⚖️ After the 2016 election, a narrative of Trump's collusion with Russia reportedly aimed to undermine his presidency.
• 💰 Discussion of the Mueller investigation, criticized as partisan and costly, affecting Trump's presidency significantly.
• 🤔 Victor Davis Hanson raises concerns about a conspiracy involving U.S. intelligence to block Trump's political agenda.
• 📊 The implications of high-level collusion within intelligence communities highlight a troubling political dynamic against a sitting president.

Q&A

• What conspiracy allegations were discussed regarding U.S. intelligence during Trump's presidency? 🕵️‍♂️

  Victor Davis Hansen and Tulsi Gabbard discussed allegations suggesting a conspiracy among top U.S. intelligence figures and Barack Obama to undermine President Trump's presidency. These claims center around the idea that high-level intelligence officials were involved in creating and spreading false narratives regarding Trump’s supposed collusion with Russia.

• What were the consequences of the collusion narrative on Trump's presidency? 💼

  The false narrative of collusion created significant repercussions for Donald Trump's presidency, including undermining his administration's stability and impacting individuals like Michael Flynn. The Mueller investigation, labeled as partisan and costly at $40 million, overshadowed the early years of Trump's presidency and is viewed by some, including Tulsi Gabbard, as a strategic attempt to remove him from power.

• Were there allegations of manipulation among intelligence leaders? 😮

  Yes, the segment discusses serious allegations that leaders like John Brennan and James Clapper manipulated intelligence reports to uphold the narrative of collusion. Despite claims from their subordinates stating there was no evidence of collusion, these concerns were reportedly ignored by higher-ups, including President Obama.

• What was the significance of the Steele dossier? 📜

  The Steele dossier was debunked as fraudulent during investigations which found no credible evidence of Russian collusion. Intelligence agencies, including key figures like John Brennan, James Clapper, and James Comey, were reportedly aware of findings that contradicted the dossier but continued to promote the collusion narrative.

• What findings emerged from the Mueller investigation regarding collusion? 🔍

  The Mueller investigation concluded that there was no direct evidence linking Donald Trump to Russian interference in the 2016 election. This aligns with recent claims suggesting that both U.S. intelligence and Dutch intelligence had information that contradicted the narrative of collusion, particularly regarding Hillary Clinton's campaign.

• What did Tulsi Gabbard reveal about Russian collusion? 🤔

  Tulsi Gabbard revealed that intelligence agencies were aware of the lack of evidence for Russian collusion, information that was reportedly ignored by President Obama. She suggests that there were political motivations behind the ongoing investigation into Donald Trump's alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 election.

• 00:00 Tulsi Gabbard reveals that intelligence agencies were aware of the lack of evidence for Russian collusion, which was ignored by Obama, suggesting political motivations behind the investigation. 🕵️‍♂️
• 01:18 The segment discusses allegations from the 2016 election campaign regarding collusion between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, which were never substantiated, and highlights new sources indicating that Hillary Clinton's campaign had hired operatives involved in opposition research.
• 02:36 The steel dossier was debunked as fraudulent, with investigations revealing no credible evidence of Russian collusion, contrary to what some intelligence officials reported. 🕵️‍♂️
• 03:41 The segment discusses allegations that intelligence leaders manipulated reports to support the narrative of collusion between Trump and Russia, as they ignored evidence to the contrary, which was known to high-ranking officials like John Brennan and James Clapper. 🕵️‍♂️
• 04:50 The segment discusses the aftermath of the 2016 election, alleging that a false narrative about Trump's collusion with Russia was created, leading to significant consequences for Trump's presidency and figures like Michael Flynn. It suggests this was a strategic attempt to undermine Trump, particularly labeling the Mueller investigation as partisan and costly. 🕵️‍♂️
• 06:04 Victor Davis Hansen discusses allegations suggesting a conspiracy involving top U.S. intelligence figures and Barack Obama to undermine Donald Trump's presidency through false narratives. 🕵️‍♂️