Key insights

• 🩺 Dr. Bowden advocates for Ivermectin's potential as a treatment for COVID-19 based on her research.
• ⚖️ She notes that no fatal overdoses of Ivermectin have been reported, highlighting its safety.
• 💉 The media has targeted those challenging mainstream narratives about COVID-19 treatments.
• 🚑 Dr. Bowden emphasizes the importance of personalized medicine over rigid protocols for effective patient care.
• 🚨 Widespread vaccine injuries have been largely ignored, raising questions about vaccine safety.
• 🧪 High levels of spike protein antibodies in vaccinated individuals raise concerns about long-term effects.
• 🤔 Fear tactics used by the government have degraded public trust and clarity about treatment options.
• 🔒 Censorship in the medical field stifles important discussions on treatment alternatives and vaccine risks.

Q&A

• What personal challenges has Dr. Bowden faced for her views? 🚨

  Dr. Bowden shared her struggles with backlash and censorship for publicly voicing her insights on Ivermectin and vaccines. She experienced hostility from peers and media, and even faced the loss of her hospital privileges as a consequence of her stance on controversial treatment methods.

• How did government actions impact public trust during COVID-19? 🤔

  Dr. Bowden discusses how the government used fear as a tool to control treatment options during the pandemic, leading to a decline in public trust toward health institutions. Restrictions on alternative treatments like monoclonal antibodies and the emphasis on vaccination over other options contributed to this erosion of trust.

• What concerns did Dr. Bowden raise regarding vaccine safety? 🚨

  Dr. Bowden has expressed concerns about the long-term persistence of spike protein antibodies in vaccinated individuals and the potential for long-term damage. She criticizes the lack of transparency and scrutiny in the COVID vaccine approval process, which has diminished her trust in the healthcare system.

• What are Dr. Bowden’s views on personalized medicine for critically ill patients? 🚑

  Dr. Bowden argues for the significance of personalized medicine, suggesting that aggressive treatment plans tailored to the individual can lead to higher survival rates in critically ill patients. She also raises awareness about the prevalence of vaccine injuries that remain largely ignored by authorities.

• What challenges does Dr. Bowden mention regarding media coverage of unconventional treatments? 🩺

  Dr. Bowden points out that there have been coordinated media attacks aiming to discredit Ivermectin and the doctors who support alternative treatments. This has stifled important discussions, leading to fear and ridicule directed at healthcare providers who advocate for early and adaptable treatment methods.

• Why was Ivermectin criticized in the media? 💉

  Ivermectin faced criticism not due to safety concerns but because it posed a low-cost alternative to vaccines, threatening their widespread acceptance. Media outlets shaped a negative narrative against Ivermectin, even portraying it inaccurately in key reports such as the Rolling Stone article, which was refuted by hospitals.

• What does Dr. Mary Bowden say about Ivermectin's effectiveness in treating COVID-19? 🩺

  Dr. Bowden emphasizes that Ivermectin has been effective in treating over 6,000 COVID-19 patients in her clinic. She conducted her own research and found no fatal overdose reports in poison control databases, advocating for a personalized treatment approach tailored to each patient's age and health status.

• 00:00 Dr. Mary Bowden discusses the effectiveness and safety of Ivermectin in treating COVID-19 patients, emphasizing her personal research and experience despite media skepticism. 🩺
• 01:46 The video discusses the political and media backlash faced by those who advocated for ivermectin against COVID-19, highlighting how challenges to the official narrative were met with attacks and misrepresentation. 💉
• 03:33 Dr. Bowden highlights the coordinated media attacks against ivermectin and unconventional treatments, revealing how these efforts have stifled discussions and created fear among patients and doctors. She advocates for the use of real-world experience over rigid government protocols in treating COVID-19, emphasizing the importance of early and adaptable treatment methods. 🩺
• 05:28 Dr. Bowden highlights the importance of personalized medicine for critically ill patients and reports widespread vaccine injuries largely ignored by authorities. 🚑
• 07:26 Dr. Bowden highlights alarming findings on spike protein antibodies remaining high in vaccinated individuals long after vaccination, raising concerns about long-term effects. She criticizes the marketing of COVID vaccines over scientific integrity, noting a lack of transparency in safety data, which has eroded her trust in the system. Additionally, she discusses the personal and professional backlash she faced for publicly sharing her insights, emphasizing the challenges of censorship in the medical field. 🚨
• 09:21 The government used fear to control treatment options during COVID-19, leading to a breakdown of public trust in institutions and a lack of clarity on vaccine risks and treatment alternatives. 🤔